INTERRACTION OF PUBLIC AND SECRET INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS IN CRIMINAL PROCESS OF REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Abstract

In the context of the criminal procedure law and criminal procedure law addresses the issue of the place of covert investigative actions in the system of criminal procedure proof. There is a lack in the existing norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan clarification of the term "investigative actions", as well as the presence of an ambiguous approach to this concept, and in the legal literature. With the introduction of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2014 self Chapter 30 "undercover investigations" there is a need delineation investigation into two separate types: overt and covert. The article contains a comparative analysis of the procedural peculiarities of the production of overt and covert investigation. In particular, in the production of vowels investigation person carrying out pre-trial investigation, it is obliged to familiarize the participants with the results of his observations in order to identify any requests for modifications or additions to recorded information. After the undercover investigation on the results obtained only informed the public prosecutor and the authority in whose production is being investigated a criminal case. It provided that, in spite of the different species, and vowels, and secret investigations have retained their search, cognitive and orientation of identification, speaking the main method of collecting evidentiary information.