THE MEANING AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52026/2788-5291_2026_81_1_39Keywords:
Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, legal position, judicial practice, normative resolution, law enforcement, legal system, administration of justice, legal stability, comparative law, doctrinal positions, philosophy of law, interpretation of legislation, judge’s dissenting opinion, legal regulation, court decisionsAbstract
This article provides a comprehensive examination of the essence, legal nature, mechanisms of formation, and the role of the legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the legal system. The legal positions of the Supreme Court are characterized as a significant legal phenomenon that ensures the uniformity of judicial practice through the application and interpretation of legal norms. The author highlights the main features of legal positions: normative foundation, binding force, universal applicability, stability, and their supplementary nature to normative acts. The study employs legal, theoretical-legal, and comparative methods, analyzing the practices of the courts of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation in a comparative context. The classification and types of legal positions are discussed, along with their manifestations in judicial decisions, normative resolutions, information letters, and judges’ dissenting opinions. The article also explores the role of legal positions in doctrinal, law-making, and law enforcement spheres. Emphasis is placed on the importance of legal positions not only as tools of law enforcement but also as mechanisms for systematizing legal ideas and improving legislation. The author analyzes the logical, linguistic, and philosophical aspects of legal positions, substantiating their impact on legal decision-making. It is emphasized that the systematization and development of the Supreme Court’s legal positions make a significant contribution to improving the quality of judicial practice and strengthening the rule of law. The article is highly relevant for both academic research and legal practice. Therefore, the materials presented offer valuable insights for understanding the internal logic of the national legal system, ensuring legal justice, enhancing judicial practice, and contributing to the development of legal theory.
Keywords: Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan; legal position; judicial practice; normative resolution; law enforcement (legal application); legal system; administration of justice; legal stability; comparative law; doctrinal positions; philosophy of law; interpretation of legislation; judge’s dissenting opinion; legal regulation; court decisions.